Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 634 | Total Threads: 50,816 | Total Posts: 518,465 Currently Active Users: 934 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, simifeltham |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-03-2010, 07:26 PM | #31 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Seeing the Motocorse version made me change idea about the new monster, the under-engine exhaust gives it that little bit more balance IMO, the success of the old monster I think was a lot to do with being able to change and swap parts from other bikes and the wealth of accessories that came out in the long life span of the bike. I think Ducati once more have been ahead of the styling curve, with a bike 4/5 years ahead of others in terms of design. Surely some design clues will appeals to some rather than others, but is a fine piece both in terms of engineering and style.
The only critic I would move to Ducati was to do the Streetfighter rather than a S4-like engined Monster. Would I buy one? no if it means selling mine, but I understand why people that own one like them so much, is a worthy successor. Still, the OP will have a much clearer idea now...not. Last edited by Pomp1; 01-03-2010 at 07:29 PM.. |
01-03-2010, 07:36 PM | #32 |
Fanactical volunteer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kent
Bike: M900
Posts: 9,033
|
I had the money for a streetfighter S. It isnt a Monster so I didnt by it. By Katos Law it probably is a Monster as it has the complete trellis frame unlike the New Monster and the ultimate Desmosedici which also has a V4 or L4 engine and not the norm.
What I never liked about the new monster was the exhaust over the engine and will change it. I never liked the headlight until I used it and when viewed on it looks round. It does look tall the 1100 but thats to my advantage. My s4 dragged its ar$e as did the m900. They were truly great bikes otherwise I wouldn't be on my 3rd Monster of three evolutions.
__________________
http://albies93m900.blogspot.co.uk/ |
01-03-2010, 08:40 PM | #33 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
The new Monsters are stunning to look at, the ride is perfect, handling fantastic and the chics love them. Unless you're Casey or Rossi there's nothing it between old and new Monsters, as it's the rider that makes the bike fast. I have a 696 and have no worries about keeping up and passing bigger bikes. There's nothing wrong with the new engine, yes it could be better, but it's much improved over the previous models. Having said that, there are some classics that will always be hard to beat, the Chrome special editions, Alien Monster, S4RS, and Diegos bike is timeless...rock n roll dude |
|
01-03-2010, 10:50 PM | #34 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
02-03-2010, 07:05 AM | #35 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
02-03-2010, 07:14 AM | #36 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Like the old monster find the new ones a bit small, as for the watercooled debate had to be done as tuno,speed triple,hornet,brutale where stealing there sales as the old 900 just did'nt cut it in the performace stakes (not a slight on the 900 i love em) 999 uneversally hated as an ugly bike (though lucky it performed on the race track), from a company that made the best looking sports bike of all time (916/996/998) 848,1098,1198 are things of lust just ride one the are just awsome but what ever your happy with go for it (oh in my opinion the streetfighter is somthing else entirely) that is the latest shot at the supernaked market which again has left ducati behind |
|
02-03-2010, 07:32 AM | #37 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I can see where Jerry is coming from with the 999 - sure it's not pretty, but he did say Yummy not Pretty...
I agree the 916 is beautiful - as Animal says, perhaps the prettiest sports-bike of all time, but the 999 is far more distinctive, and in time (perhaps that time is now?) will be regarded as one of Ducati's defining machines - it's dominance in WSB has set the (sporting arm of the) company up for the International recognition and success it enjoys today? - I would even suggest that without the (sporting) success of the 999, I doubt Ducati would have been able to secure the level of sponsorship for their MotoGP programme in quite the same way? As for the current generation of sports bikes (1198 etc) - I think Animal has hit the nail on the head - they've been designed to compete with the competition... but conversely, have not set any particular standard of their own? J xx ps. and the new Monsters look like toys... fun toys I admit, but there is less elegance and more purpose to them - a bit like the 999 in fact?! |
02-03-2010, 08:17 AM | #38 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
999, another bike which was years ahead of its time.
|
02-03-2010, 08:24 AM | #39 |
These must fit a Monster?
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Stockton Heath
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 1,036
|
Been keeping out of this (Although finding it a very good and interesting read, I love how this forum can talk about things like this without it descending in to anarchy)...
Have to say though, I'm a fan of the 999, hoping to get myself one in a few years time, always wanted one, love em to bits!
__________________
"Sometimes it takes a whole tankful of fuel before you can think straight." |
02-03-2010, 09:40 AM | #40 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
yes the 999 is a fantastic ride just was never sold on the looks. I think this was partly cause I was a massive foggy fan thus wanted a 916
But as pointed out and what i was getting at the 999 dominated WSB like no other bike, The 1098's 1198's will carve out there own way in time 916/996/998 This video explains quite well why it was so important http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i6K2CUdqURg But with out the monster the company would not be anymore it is the bike that saved them, as the saying goes behind every ducati superbike is a legion of monster !! |
02-03-2010, 09:45 AM | #41 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I like them both, they had to progress really didn't they, I mean what next after the S4RS Testrawatsit.
I think the new design looks so much better in the flesh than in pics, I parked my old 600 next to a 696 the other day, which to be honest is the bike I would really like if I had any cash but they both look better than most other bikes you see around, the old one is slightly more distinctive but then I bet it doesn't break down every time it rains, personally I'd have one of each. |
02-03-2010, 09:47 AM | #42 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hee hee - and it was beaten by the Honda Cub! - are Discovery out of their minds?!
Great video though... J x |
02-03-2010, 11:11 AM | #43 |
Old Git
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cricklade
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,831
|
916,996 ,998 = beautiful
749,999= more beautiful 1098,848,1198 =Bland but nice .
__________________
MONSTERMAN |
02-03-2010, 12:50 PM | #44 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
If you want performance and sportyness superbike buy one of the 999, 916's or 1098's.
If you want charecture something you can adapt , customise I guess and make your own buy a monster. Different breed of bikes I feel.. The sporty models are growing on me but I would opt for a Superlight myself. This is not to say some of the bigger Monny's don't offer performance at all , I hope you get what I mean. However you could park 10 red 999's in a row and it would take a while to spot your mates bike lol. Park a row of Monsters up and most would not be the same. I love the diversity of this site , and the fact most bikes have been adapted , tweeked or what have you,so most are different to each other. I must say the ride on some of those bikes probably awesome... I just couldn't have a bike that I couldn't do much with looks wise had to stay plain and well you know what I mean!!.... Plus I am one of the few who like yellow Dukes..ok ok I know!!! |
02-03-2010, 02:11 PM | #45 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I dont quite go with that arguement - you could customise a honda c90 as much as an old monster, doesn't mean it's better
Or you could customise a new monster as much as an old monster - well almost but you will be able to without a doubt in the next few years. |
|
|