UK Monster Owners Club Forum » .: Technical :. » Electrics » integrated tail light

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 29-08-2012, 06:14 PM   #1
smiffyraf1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
integrated tail light

hi guys got one of the motodynamics integrated tail lights on the monster but concerned it wont pass the MOT with it on and am stuggling to find an original unit on fleabay. was going to just get the light and harness and just disconnect the integrated one as had to chop wires up and add resisters to get it working.
are they passable by some testers or should i keep looking is basically the question im asking.
it would be going straight back on after test anyway as it looks the nuts.
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2012, 06:29 PM   #2
rollo22
Moderator
 
rollo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Moreton-in-Marsh
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 1,082
Take it in and see what happens.
They might not even test the indicators.
My mot was look at tires check brake light and number plate and wait 30 mins for paper work
__________________
IF ALL ELSE FAILS READ THE INSTRUCTIONS
rollo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2012, 06:34 PM   #3
sage
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
ask your mot man before you get it tested mine past at allenby commercials lincoln 540013
  Reply With Quote
Old 29-08-2012, 06:59 PM   #4
Funkatronic
another year another bike
 
Funkatronic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: London
Bike: S2r 1000
Posts: 1,597
have an oem tail light in good shape from an s2r, some of the "chrome" has flaked off the bezel but its otherwise in VGC
Funkatronic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2012, 01:29 PM   #5
Nottsbiker
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Disconnect the integrated indicators if you still have stock ones fitted and you'll be fine. I would imagine its down to the individual tester as to whether they choose to fail it.

Technically the indicators are too close together for UK regs iirc
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2012, 04:50 PM   #6
bigfiretruck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
They have changed the legislation (according to my MOT man) and mine should have failed but i have the two sticking out of the side still so it passed

just keep the old 2 and make sure it doesn't turn out half of the brake light in preference for the indicators (which is a failure!)
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2012, 08:07 PM   #7
smiffyraf1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well spoke to him and have got to take it to show him tomorrow morning, if not might take u up on the offer of tail light.
  Reply With Quote
Old 30-08-2012, 09:05 PM   #8
smiffyraf1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
how much were u after for the oem unit funkatronic?
  Reply With Quote
Old 31-08-2012, 04:48 AM   #9
final_edition
Registered User
 
final_edition's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bexley
Bike: S4
Posts: 121
Take all indicators of for MOT, they are not needed. Then re-fit after test.
final_edition is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 07:56 PM   #10
JMo
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by final_edition View Post
Take all indicators of for MOT, they are not needed. Then re-fit after test.
They are needed on a 'road' bike, unless you are going for a daylight use only MOT test...

Road bikes have to have indicators since about 1982 [I believe], it is only bikes "designed primarily for off-road use, and have no provision for a passenger" (ie. no pillion pegs) that are exempt for a full MOT...

Jx

ps. fwiw - I have the combined brake/tail/indicators on my bike, and as of May this year, technically they do now fail the MOT - not because of the spacing (that is Construction and Use, not MOT), but, as BigFireTruck says, it is because when the indicator part flashes, it masks half the brake light...* The fact the other half of the brake light is still showing seems to have passed the legislators by - particularly as there is no set minimum size for a brake tail light anyway...

*Not sure what all these Harley Sportster riders are going to do in three years time, as the current model has no separate tail light, rather the two turn signals are also the brake tail lights, in an American stylee...
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 08:00 PM   #11
slob
.
 
slob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: East London
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 9,702
Don't know if his is still the case but it was in the late '80s: If the bike is eligible for no indicators, the switch must also be removed.
slob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 09:27 AM   #12
Dookbob
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My M600 failed the MOT on the integrated tail light thingy, apparently if the indicator switches off half of the tail light as it flashes, then it,s a failure. I disconnected the indicator wires and fitted a pair of LED separate indicators to gat it passed. The tester explained the new ruling to me, which he said all testers are not aware of yet. The numpty who dreamed up the new rule must have a brain the size of a peanut.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 09:49 AM   #13
smiffyraf1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
well the deal is he will pass it but put a note on the mot saying no rear indicators fitted to cover his bum, im happy with that as even he said theres no point in him saying fit a legal unit as i will just fit the integrated one back on as soon as i get back from test
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2012, 10:53 AM   #14
S4Rs MacK
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Had one on my old RS and the tester at the station i use showed me the literature from VOSA which outlaws the integrated tail lights so officially every station should be failing them. He liked my bike that much though so he let me pass. Lol.
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:12 PM.

vBulletin Skins by vBmode.com. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.