Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 605 | Total Threads: 50,801 | Total Posts: 518,376 Currently Active Users: 373 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, ian66 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
16-02-2018, 12:27 PM | #1 |
.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stockbridge
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,984
|
A worthwhile cost saving.
How do the weights compare: The Oro looks a little heavier in the web design and has fewer and smaller holes in the disc itself?
__________________
Original and Best since 1993 |
16-02-2018, 12:40 PM | #2 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southampton
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 2,465
|
Quote:
1505g Serie Oro 1633g OE Money saved and weight saved too! Can't be bad. |
|
16-02-2018, 01:11 PM | #3 |
.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stockbridge
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,984
|
That's a result.
Weight saving usually costs dear, especially on unsprung spinning components! Ask the guys with the carbon wheels what the cost per gramme weight reduction is........?
__________________
Original and Best since 1993 |
|
|