Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 607 | Total Threads: 50,803 | Total Posts: 518,380 Currently Active Users: 325 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, WazS4r |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
21-05-2019, 06:50 PM | #1 |
Pleasantly surprised!
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Stoke on Trent
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 780
|
Just because...
I certainly haven't decided to to do it, just musing over the possibilities. Why would the bike be more likely to lose adhesion on the rear wheel? My bike is a bit lighter than standard (i really should get it weighed) and has a few extra ponies too. I would never sell it for an S2R - 900 is the classic number and its all I need & more.
__________________
Monsters don't hide under the bed, they sleep inside the shed |
21-05-2019, 07:12 PM | #2 |
.
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Stockbridge
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,984
|
Increasing the unsprung weight with a heavier swingarm assembly would make it more difficult for the spring and damper to keep the wheel on the floor, but lighter wheels, brakes etc could more than compensate compared with standard: though lighter everything would be a better target for performance and handling.
__________________
Original and Best since 1993 Last edited by Darkness; 21-05-2019 at 07:12 PM.. Reason: Spell wrecker. |
21-05-2019, 07:36 PM | #3 | |
Pleasantly surprised!
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Stoke on Trent
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 780
|
Quote:
Is this not a case of yes there is less traction, because there is more weight, but in reality it is negligable? I've ridden a few 916's and this didn't seem to be an issue... I'm an old git, riding an old bike, and its hard for me to think this is something to be concerned about - but happy to learn different.
__________________
Monsters don't hide under the bed, they sleep inside the shed Last edited by Jez900ie; 21-05-2019 at 07:42 PM.. |
|
|
|