1100 Evo remap

Uncle Bob · 06-11-2019, 01:56 PM

This is similar to what I found, initially. It actually got a bit better after probably two or three hundred miles (I wasn't paying much attention to mileage) but then the old 'stock' bad fuelling symptoms returned? That stuck with me for another hundred or so miles, at a guess, then, weirdly, after mid-ride stop off for some photos one day it suddenly started behaving itself again?!

Now then, I'm not saying that this was necessarily to do with the remap, I don't actually know what caused it, but I'm happy to say that it's back to being 'improved over stock but not perfect' again.

If you put a 14t sprocket on it I'd be interested to hear what you think about it then.

chris.p · 06-11-2019, 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Uncle Bob

If you put a 14t sprocket on it I'd be interested to hear what you think about it then.

From further up the thread, my report is done with a 14th front sprocket.

http://www.ukmonster.co.uk/monster/s...ad.php?t=50780

Luddite · 06-11-2019, 04:04 PM

Glad you've seen an improvement, Steve, and you can't fault Neil's customer service can you?

Your situation mirrors my own, in that you're coming from a custom-mapped S2R to a stock Evo. And your observations following the remap reflect my experience too.

Lowering the gearing will improve matters further and also make sixth gear useable, rather than the virtual 'overdrive' it is on stock sprockets.

Also don't forget that the S2R is twin spark and its flywheel is twice the weight of the Evo's; both factors that will allow the S2R to run better at low, steady, speeds than the Evo.

You may well find that it improves further over the next couple of hundred miles as the ECU relearns the autoadaptive parameters.

Enjoy your 'new' Evo!

Uncle Bob · 11-11-2019, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chris.p

From further up the thread, my report is done with a 14th front sprocket.

http://www.ukmonster.co.uk/monster/s...ad.php?t=50780

Yeah I know, thanks Chris, I've read all your posts on this subject before I got my Rexxer map done (and probably since, too). However what we know is that the remap affects different bikes to slightly different degrees, which is why I was interested to hear what another person thought about it.

06-11-2019, 01:56 PM	#1
Uncle Bob Registered User Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: Milton Keynes Bike: M1100evo Posts: 233	This is similar to what I found, initially. It actually got a bit better after probably two or three hundred miles (I wasn't paying much attention to mileage) but then the old 'stock' bad fuelling symptoms returned? That stuck with me for another hundred or so miles, at a guess, then, weirdly, after mid-ride stop off for some photos one day it suddenly started behaving itself again?! Now then, I'm not saying that this was necessarily to do with the remap, I don't actually know what caused it, but I'm happy to say that it's back to being 'improved over stock but not perfect' again. If you put a 14t sprocket on it I'd be interested to hear what you think about it then.

06-11-2019, 04:04 PM	#3
Luddite Registered User Join Date: Aug 2011 Location: Southampton Bike: M1100evo Posts: 2,465	Glad you've seen an improvement, Steve, and you can't fault Neil's customer service can you? Your situation mirrors my own, in that you're coming from a custom-mapped S2R to a stock Evo. And your observations following the remap reflect my experience too. Lowering the gearing will improve matters further and also make sixth gear useable, rather than the virtual 'overdrive' it is on stock sprockets. Also don't forget that the S2R is twin spark and its flywheel is twice the weight of the Evo's; both factors that will allow the S2R to run better at low, steady, speeds than the Evo. You may well find that it improves further over the next couple of hundred miles as the ECU relearns the autoadaptive parameters. Enjoy your 'new' Evo!