Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 634 | Total Threads: 50,816 | Total Posts: 518,465 Currently Active Users: 932 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, simifeltham |
|
|
Thread Tools | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
|
09-08-2008, 04:28 PM | #1 |
Fanactical volunteer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Kent
Bike: M900
Posts: 9,033
|
Sr swingarms are beefier than dual and also more heavier so therefore more stable.
The side exhausts also balance the bike up to counterrset the monocoque. This erradicates the vertical downforces on the midsection over the cross spars leverage. This maintains that the equal forces on the horizontal can side plane thus not allowing the inert comendiums to exchange excess heat through the main chamber keeping the rear light from vibrating loose. So whos wrong then. |
09-08-2008, 06:58 PM | #2 | |
Upsetting normal people..
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Portreath
Bike: S2r
Posts: 833
|
Quote:
Therefore, taking your thoughts into consideration, surely S*R's with Termis are all wrong ?? And it's be made even worse when you nail a honking great lump filled with water on the front... So you're wrong, ner ner ne ner ner... |
|
09-08-2008, 08:59 PM | #3 |
Too much time on my hands member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Forest Of Dean
Bike: S2r
Posts: 3,195
|
And of course two exhausts adding thrust on one side AND EVEN WORSE the opposite side to the sadly deficient swinging arm can only cause a greater falling over effect.
__________________
"The final measure of any rider's skill is the inverse ratio of his preferred Traveling Speed to the number of bad scars on his body." Song of the sausage creature |
|
|