Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Today's Posts | Search | Contact |
|
Registered
Members: 635 | Total Threads: 50,820 | Total Posts: 518,481 Currently Active Users: 1,130 (0 active members) Please welcome our newest member, Bunnyrides |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-05-2018, 05:51 PM | #1 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 471
|
Rear wheel/spindle
Hi all, OK my latest issue is to do with my rear wheel & spindle. The bike is based on a 1994 machine with the original 17mm spindle, I have been using a 4.5" rear wheel but with my next round of mods I'm going to a 5.5". I've got one off a 2003 ST2 but the bearings & the internal spacer tube, is obviously for a larger diameter spindle, what can I do to make it fit my 17mm set up?
__________________
Bitza |
18-05-2018, 08:22 PM | #2 |
Lord of the Rings
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Norwich
Bike: M900sie
Posts: 5,848
|
Funnily enough I have been mulling over how to make a wheel with a 25mm hollow spindle, work with a 17mm axle.
First call would be to look for bearings with the same outer diameter and a 17mm inner diameter. The easiest way to do that is to take one of each bearings from both types of wheel and spend a little time leaning against the counter in the bearing shop. Failing that being a success, I would look into getting bushes turned up to be an interference fit, inside of the larger bearings to reduce them down to 17mm. It is most important that the assembly clamps up the inner races as per normal with whatever size spindle, so the 17mm spacer must be used. If bushes are used to reduce the inner race diameter then I think that a thicker wall spacer tube should be made to bear on both the inner races and the bushes. Except of course there might not be any actual clamping force on the outside of the inner races in that case, unless adaptions are made to whatever contacts them normally. (tricky in my case as I have the floating calliper.) One bonus of using a later wheel might be the availability of polyurethane cush drive inserts? My reasoning that the inner races must be clamped, is that the wheel could slip sideways off any bushing applied to the inner races, if only the bushes are clamped. ...Just realised that I have made a Utopian type post and should end with a note, something like; I've no personal experience of this and am unfamiliar with the 25mm spindle set up... must make another pot of tea.. ect.. ect..
__________________
Last edited by Mr Gazza; 18-05-2018 at 08:27 PM.. |
18-05-2018, 08:58 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leics
Bike: M900
Posts: 2,848
|
Quote:
I think they are 6303-2RS which have a 17mm ID rather than 6005-2RS with a 25mm ID but check the width of the existing bearing/spacer combination as there maybe some differences (6303 is 14mm thick and some bearings are only 12mm thick).
__________________
M900, 916, LeMans II. |
|
18-05-2018, 09:35 PM | #4 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 471
|
Well thanks guys, as usual I'm highly impresssed with the knowledge that's out there and the response time, are you just waiting to solve my problems? if so I have this rather hefty debt.... thanks for the help, Bitza.
__________________
Bitza |
19-05-2018, 07:01 AM | #5 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Sorry for the thread hi-jack @bitza |
|
19-05-2018, 08:14 AM | #6 |
Too much time on my hands member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Stonehouse, Glos
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,080
|
Just have a quick check to make sure the wheel spoke shapes match, if that would be something that you are concerned about. The early wheels have spokes that are narrow at the hub and wide at the rim, the later ones are the other way around.
|
19-05-2018, 09:02 AM | #7 | |
Lord of the Rings
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Norwich
Bike: M900sie
Posts: 5,848
|
Quote:
Thanks Dukedesmo for the info and saying so much with so few words.
__________________
|
|
23-05-2018, 05:14 PM | #8 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 471
|
OK so have done a bit more research re; bearings to fit the later wheel (25mm spindle) and an earlier 17mm spindle set up. I haven't found any standard bearings to suit, but have found a specialist type which I think should do the job. The size is 17x47x12 (inner dia x outer dia x width), the bearing is a sealed cam roller ball bearing with cylindrical outer. These bearing are designed to be used as rollers, where the inner race is fixed to the device and the outside of the outer race is utilised as the track roller, so the outer race is beefed up/thickened to take the wear & additional forces of being a roller. However I have been assured that there is no reason why they cannot be used as a standard bearing. However there are two types of these one of which has a radiused outer referred to as "crowned" (to make it a more practical roller) which you do NOT want, the other form has straight cross-section which is one to get. Most of this type of bearing seem to be coming out of China, but I have found an alternative supplier INA (part of a goup that includes FAG which I have heard of), their number for the bearing is LR203 and I've been quoted around £18 inc vat.
So hopefully by sleeving down the original 25mm inner spacer to 17mm I should be in business, mind you as I'm writing this have just thought that I had better check the widths of the two types of wheel. Just when I thought I had cracked it too. Bitza
__________________
Bitza |
30-05-2018, 04:48 PM | #9 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 471
|
Bad news, the 2003 ST2 rear wheel (25mm spindle) hub is approx 6mm wider, on the sprocket side so I'm at a loss to see how I can make it fit my 1994 frame/swinging arm, so has anybody got a spare 2001 type (17mm spindle) 5.5" three spoke rear wheel (with spoke getting smaller towards the rim), and of course is anybody looking for a ST2 wheel in grey?
__________________
Bitza |
30-05-2018, 10:41 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,510
|
I've put a pair of ST2 wheels in my 900SS mongrel project and had exactly the same issues.
The standard SS wheels, spacers etc are the same as the standard Monster parts so the same resolutions apply. After changing the bearings for ones of the right combination of inner and outer diameter I reduced the overall width by skimming a few mm off the sprocket carrier etc in my lathe. Because I couldn't get bearings in the correct combination of ID, OD, and width, I ended up with wider ones and cut the bearing pockets in the wheels deeper in a mill. Unfortunately my mill is too small to take the wheel so I had to borrow one at a friends business. Of course I also had to make up a new smaller ID and shorter bearing spacer tubes for inside the wheel hubs. I seem to remember I gained a couple of mm by reducing the length of the spacer between the wheel bearing and sprocket carrier bearing, taking up most of the gap that was between the sprocket carrier and wheel, then the rest came off the outer spacer and a little off the outer face of the carrier to get a gap back. Chain alignment was put right by skimming a couple of mm off the face the sprocket bolts to. As you can see, both ST2 Wheels are in: Nasher
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over. Last edited by Nasher; 30-05-2018 at 10:58 PM.. |
31-05-2018, 12:09 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Barnsley
Bike: M1100s
Posts: 238
|
Nice Bench
__________________
Always remember. Your home is at risk if you set fire to it. |
31-05-2018, 12:45 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,510
|
Thanks.
I spent too many years bent double over bikes to attempt another full build without some way of lifting it up to a better height. The advantage over a lifting bench for a long term build is the storage space underneath. Plus of course at @£40 for the materials including HD Castors, you are not tying up an expensive lifting bench for the duration. Nasher
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over. |
31-05-2018, 04:22 PM | #13 | |
Pleasantly surprised!
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Stoke on Trent
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 780
|
Quote:
The solution to the wheel fitment is clever, and satisfying to achieve yourself The bike is cool
__________________
Monsters don't hide under the bed, they sleep inside the shed Last edited by Jez900ie; 31-05-2018 at 09:40 PM.. |
|
31-05-2018, 09:14 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,510
|
Thanks Jez900ie
In case anyone is thinking of building a similar bench, it's worth pointing out that it's heavily over-engineered for strength and safety with 3 longitudinal beams top and bottom. In addition I put a central bulkhead in the two end quarters to stop any chance of it folding flat. Nasher
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over. |
02-07-2018, 05:28 PM | #15 |
Bronze Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Poole
Bike: M900ie
Posts: 471
|
Haven't been able to find anyone willing to take on re-machining the 25mm spindle wheel into the 17mm format, so have found myself a wheel of a 2001 900ie Monster, which is plainly what I should have done in the first place, well next time?! Bitza.
__________________
Bitza |
|
|