UK Monster Owners Club Forum » .: Technical :. » Engines, Clutch, Gears » Cable vs Hydraulic

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 24-07-2023, 08:07 PM   #1
crawsue
Bronze Member
 
crawsue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Glasgow
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 276
Smile Cable vs Hydraulic

Apologies if this has been kicked around before but I’m interested in learning the views of you knowledgeable people……I am fortunate to have 3 modernish bikes, 2 Triumphs (1050st & T100 Bonnie) both have cable clutches and perform well with no noticeable “heaviness “…..my Evo has a hydraulic action. My mates new Hypermotard is hydraulic but another pal has a modern Supersport, which I think has a similar engine to the Hypermotard, the clutch on the SS is cable. Today I joined a pal on his brand new GSX”S”…..1000cc supernaked…..with a cable clutch.
To my nonengineering brain it would appear that cable should be cheaper to fit….so what advantage does hydraulic have on a motorcycle application ?
crawsue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-07-2023, 08:26 PM   #2
jerry
Old Git
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cricklade
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,897
All 4 of my ducatis from 1991 to the 2001 model have Hydraulic , some times they are glitchy
my 2022 Z900 is cable as is my Daughters 2019 Z650 both are very sweet ,, my old HD is cable but even with so called light clutch set up its heaavy

Crawsue does your T100 Bonny have any engine braking because every Hinkley Bony from 2016 to now that I have ridden had zero engine braking and I have tried every model
__________________
MONSTERMAN
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24-07-2023, 11:48 PM   #3
Nickj
Too much time on my hands member
 
Nickj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Forest Of Dean
Bike: S2r
Posts: 3,206
Might be 6 of one and half dozen of the other..

In the very late 60's honda bought out the CB750 with hydraulic brakes, it was a bit techy, a bit flash AND suddenly every bike manufacturer had to add them or they'd be seen as a bit old fashioned.
It is undoubtedly easier to set up hydraulics than a 2LS drum of even a 4LS but much more difficult to strip and rebuild a hydraulic system.

I suspect that as a good 2LS or a 4LS can be a very effective system that on road bikes it's more about style than anything else. On dirtbikes definitely more fashion, on a sandy enduro most disk pads were toast after a few short hours at a wet sandy venue the rear drums kept on working though.
Modern race bikes where the disks can be seen going a dull cherry red it's more about having a working system.

I'd blame Honda
__________________
"The final measure of any rider's skill is the inverse ratio of his preferred Traveling Speed to the number of bad scars on his body." Song of the sausage creature
Nickj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-2023, 10:09 AM   #4
350TSS
Too much time on my hands member
 
350TSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Shipbourne
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,422
From the manufacturer's viewpoint cable operation will be a cheaper option and possibly lead to either a better margin or a more competitive retail price.
Most clutch actuating mechanisms operate via a push rod through the main shaft of the gearbox which means a cable clutch has a cable routed across the top of the gearbox or a cranked pull from the front, the cable can suffer with a tortuous route to the LH lever, particularly around the headstock. Hydraulics have less of a problem with sharp corners on route between the master and slave cylinders and are easier to route away from excessive heat which might adversely affect a cable. Manufacturers, I suspect, would prefer a hydraulic operation when designing a bike platform as it would be easier to accommodate a multitude of handlebar positions , instrument clusters, exhaust routings across a range of types of motorcycle.
From a reliability perspective my experience of both cable and hydraulic I have never had a cable break but on 3 occasions have had hydraulics misbehave
350TSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-2023, 11:12 AM   #5
Mr Gazza
Lord of the Rings
 
Mr Gazza's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Norwich
Bike: M900sie
Posts: 5,963
It's all about friction with a cable.
Maybe they have improved over the years and are made with better friction reducing materials, but will still be prone to sudden catastrophic failure, in other words they snap or a nipple pulls out!

Some interesting observations here; http://www.ukmonster.co.uk/monster/s...spring+balance particularly on post #15 comparing hydraulic and cable.

The comparison doesn't take mechanical advantage into consideration, but highlights how the friction increases dramatically with each deviation from a straight cable route. No such friction with hydraulic and the mechanical advantage can be manipulated with various piston sizes. With modern radial masters this can even be manipulated via adjustable lever fulcrums.
With a cable you're pretty much stuck with what you've got unless you can somehow alter lever lengths, and that's after all the cable drag!
__________________
Mr Gazza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-2023, 11:56 AM   #6
Nickj
Too much time on my hands member
 
Nickj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Forest Of Dean
Bike: S2r
Posts: 3,206
Like the hydraulic brakes introduction the hydraulic clutch took off and one of the given reason was easier pull than cable-actuated clutches. It was also a new and exciting selling point. As Mr Gaza says the cable is the weal part of the system and the liners no matter what they are wear and get glitchy.
A side effect of the easier pull allowed the use stiffer clutch springs, making the clutch stronger and handling more torque. Given the power outputs of modern engines you'd need a more complex arrangement that a long lever at one end or the other to give you a good chance of pulling the bar lever in.
They are also able to provide a more consistent feel than cable-actuated clutches and they do simplify the manufacturing process though I'm not sure how but KTM for one says that they do. Instead of a cable pulling on an arm to actuate the clutch, the hydraulic system obviously uses a clutch slave cylinder and a push rod, and they can be tucked inside the motor casings.
The hydraulics do need bleeding but once set it stays pretty much the same and doesn't need to be tweaked as the clutch wears or the cable stretches.
And you can change the slave or master to tweak the hydraulics feel and pull weight.

Also as Mr Gaza noted you won't get your nipples pulled off, possibly the best advantage as it's potentially painful ..
__________________
"The final measure of any rider's skill is the inverse ratio of his preferred Traveling Speed to the number of bad scars on his body." Song of the sausage creature
Nickj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25-07-2023, 07:32 PM   #7
crawsue
Bronze Member
 
crawsue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Glasgow
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 276
Interesting points, I suspect that from a purely
engineering led perspective then hydraulic is the “ go to “ solution…..and I understand the friction argument of cable routing and also the ability to build in stronger clutches……BUT, my two Trumpets have sweet, easy to use cable operations + the T100 is 19 years old and 36 k mls….on the original cable….the ST produces around 130 bhp and the clutch copes fine.
And so far no response to Ducati using both cable and hydraulic on similar engines…..?
crawsue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-07-2023, 09:48 AM   #8
Kato
Dismantled
 
Kato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: East Molesey
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,242
Hydraulic clutches are generally easier to modulate and have a lighter, more consistent lever pull since there's a master cylinder and a slave cylinder amplifying your grip strength
In general sport bikes / Race bikes use cables in preference to hydraulic, as they are simple and can be adjusted easily.
Hydraulic clutches are more complex and require more maintenance compared to clutch cables. They are also more prone to leaks and other issues that can affect their performance, require more regular maintenance to ensure proper performance and longevity.
__________________
"Political correctness is just intellectual colonialism and psychological fascism for the creation of thought crime"

Kato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26-07-2023, 01:09 PM   #9
Nasher
Registered User
 
Nasher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Portsmouth
Bike: M900
Posts: 1,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kato View Post
Hydraulic clutches are generally easier to modulate and have a lighter, more consistent lever pull since there's a master cylinder and a slave cylinder amplifying your grip strength
What he said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kato View Post
In general sport bikes / Race bikes use cables in preference to hydraulic, as they are simple and can be adjusted easily.
Yep, far more difficult to adjust a Hydraulic Clutch
I've often thought an adjustable length push rod or screw in the slave piston would be useful, but then think that if the rest of the system is working as it should there is no need for adjustment.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kato View Post
Hydraulic clutches are more complex and require more maintenance compared to clutch cables. They are also more prone to leaks and other issues that can affect their performance, require more regular maintenance to ensure proper performance and longevity.
And there lies one of their problems
With no external adjustment or obvious maintenance regime too many assume they are a fit and forget maintenance free system

Some of us for example change our brake fluid every few years, and adding the Clutch fluid to that is natural.

Those that don't change their brake fluid get away with it a lot because the action of pushing the Caliper pistons back when new pads are required at least moves the fluid about a bit and frees off the pistons.
That just doesn't happen with a clutch.
__________________
Heaven doesn't want me, and Hell is afraid I'll take over.
Nasher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27-07-2023, 09:23 PM   #10
jerry
Old Git
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cricklade
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,897
I bleed my Hydraulic clutches every few months and change the fluid at most in 2 years but as my recent issues with an oberon unit proves they can be fickle
__________________
MONSTERMAN
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-07-2023, 09:25 AM   #11
dunf
Registered User
 
dunf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2022
Location: Dunfermline
Bike: M1200s
Posts: 32
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nickj View Post

In the very late 60's honda bought out the CB750 with hydraulic brakes, it was a bit techy, a bit flash AND suddenly every bike manufacturer had to add them or they'd be seen as a bit old fashioned.


I'd blame Honda
Pretty sure Lambretta brought out a production disc brake before Honda. I'd blame them
dunf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28-07-2023, 12:52 PM   #12
Luddite
Registered User
 
Luddite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Southampton
Bike: M1100evo
Posts: 2,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunf View Post
Pretty sure Lambretta brought out a production disc brake before Honda. I'd blame them
If we're talking early disc brakes, how about this from 1906? It's an Imperial 500 - note the scissor type 'caliper'. Still a disc though.

Luddite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 12:33 PM   #13
velosam
Registered User
 
velosam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Location: Stirling
Bike: M1000ie
Posts: 120
Followed this thread and thought I should bleed my clutch. Easy enough with a vacuum bleeding kit. Now I have lovely clear fluid... until next time. First time I have done it, didn't take too long at all.

velosam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 02:32 PM   #14
Dukedesmo
Registered User
 
Dukedesmo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Leics
Bike: M900
Posts: 2,894
Quote:
Originally Posted by jerry View Post
I bleed my Hydraulic clutches every few months and change the fluid at most in 2 years but as my recent issues with an oberon unit proves they can be fickle
I've got an Oberon slave on the Monster, works fine but the fluid turns black in a matter of weeks whereas, my 916 has an Evoluzione slave cylinder which also works fine (for 20+ years) but doesn't turn the fluid black at all, not even after 2-3 years without changing fluid.

I know most Ducati owners say their clutch fluid turns black over time but, it makes me think Evoluzione had a better design WRT to seals? Shame they're not in business anymore.
__________________
M900, 916, LeMans II.

Dukedesmo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-08-2023, 08:13 PM   #15
jerry
Old Git
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cricklade
Bike: Multiple Monsters
Posts: 2,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dukedesmo View Post
I've got an Oberon slave on the Monster, works fine but the fluid turns black in a matter of weeks whereas, my 916 has an Evoluzione slave cylinder which also works fine (for 20+ years) but doesn't turn the fluid black at all, not even after 2-3 years without changing fluid.

I know most Ducati owners say their clutch fluid turns black over time but, it makes me think Evoluzione had a better design WRT to seals? Shame they're not in business anymore.
Oberon claim the new seals used in last few years dont turn the fluid black ,, ????? not sure about that yet ???
__________________
MONSTERMAN
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:23 PM.

vBulletin Skins by vBmode.com. Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.