utopia
20-10-2016, 12:58 PM
In the past I have been surprised, nay staggered really, to find that a rear tyre which only required 5 or 10g to balance it when new, required more like 70 or 80g to rebalance it after about 4000 miles.
I've pondered this on and off , without gaining much insight into why this might happen (to such a large extent) given that all chassis bearings etc are in good nick, wheels accurately in line etc.
Then I bought a front paddock stand, so now I have a pair and could now leave the bike on two stands over the winter, relieving the load on the tyres. I used to leave it standing on both wheels from maybe november through to march.
This got me wondering ... could the developing imbalance be down to tyre deformation rather than wear ?
Surely not, you might think, :twak: but it pays to be thorough and consider all possibilities.
Any thoughts or experiences ?
The tyre in question was a Michelin PR2, by the way.
And yes, I stuck 80g on the rim and ran it for another 3000m. Wasn't entirely happy about it though, but skint at the time.
I've pondered this on and off , without gaining much insight into why this might happen (to such a large extent) given that all chassis bearings etc are in good nick, wheels accurately in line etc.
Then I bought a front paddock stand, so now I have a pair and could now leave the bike on two stands over the winter, relieving the load on the tyres. I used to leave it standing on both wheels from maybe november through to march.
This got me wondering ... could the developing imbalance be down to tyre deformation rather than wear ?
Surely not, you might think, :twak: but it pays to be thorough and consider all possibilities.
Any thoughts or experiences ?
The tyre in question was a Michelin PR2, by the way.
And yes, I stuck 80g on the rim and ran it for another 3000m. Wasn't entirely happy about it though, but skint at the time.