Saint aka ML
23-12-2015, 03:39 PM
So a small review of Hyper 821 vs all older Ducati bikes I had or ridden for significant time or mileage. This is not “is it easy to live with” comparison as had it only for like 250 miles.
This is also not a journalist opinion just mine so if you kind of person that holds grudges or argues when they do not like the outcome just skip it.
Got the bike on Saturday, so far covered just over 250 miles on it. 50 was London commute rest fun.
First off all if you cannot have a tall bike, do not like wind blast or have fear of heights this bike is not for you. All I can say is it is windy up there on the top of a hyper
So been running it in as such gently on engine but can say it is a very responsive engine, relatively smooth down below in comparison to old V2 air cooled lump. Trust me I know have an m900 that is a bitch below 3k (done 20k miles on it), m695 bit better (30k miles), had a Mosnter 750 for 8k miles, ridden hyper 1100 a lot, monster 696 (week as replacement bike) as well as 1100s (about 1k miles). Multistrada for 4k miles, 900ss for about 8k miles, 749s for 14k miles, 996 for 8k miles, 1098 for a week. Not to mention ST2, ST3 and ST4. Hyper 821 is smooth as butter in comparison.
If someone comes here and says they are rough at low RPM, bleh bleh bleh, it is a V2 it has right to be. Do not moan as it is miles better than even Ducati bikes of 1098 vintage and earlier. No idea what they done but it just is and as result is not as bad as people make it out to be.
Engine revs freely to 6k where I mostly stop but when went over that it just keeps on going. Power delivery is smooth, predictable but strong. It is not a top speed engine and you know it very quickly.
This is my 1st engine with DTC and do not see so far why it would need DTC, in fact on half of DTC settings it makes it a worse engine dangerous even will get to that.
Handling of the bike is superb you can see the evolution in progress, it tips in to corners with ease. Stays in them smoothly going round bend and then lifts up with nowhere to be seen rush but still fast. It just flows, feels you with confidence and gives great feedback. Saying that when you open a throttle some it does get a very light front which is odd seeing how much you sit at the front of it. Probably due to big suspension travel so possibly can be addressed. Many say that is what DTC is for but frankly it should just not do that at all.
In comparison Monster is harder to get it to tip in. Kind off feels like initial push on bars requires more effort but when it is moving it is just as smooth to flick about. All those flicks need more initial effort that is all. It is more stable mid corner and you can just whack the throttle open and it will pull out no fuss what so ever. It also does not want to pop a wheelie that much but if that is better is debatable. Saying that m695 is not a wheelie machine. I would still say Hyper is better in that area over all.
This is also not a journalist opinion just mine so if you kind of person that holds grudges or argues when they do not like the outcome just skip it.
Got the bike on Saturday, so far covered just over 250 miles on it. 50 was London commute rest fun.
First off all if you cannot have a tall bike, do not like wind blast or have fear of heights this bike is not for you. All I can say is it is windy up there on the top of a hyper
So been running it in as such gently on engine but can say it is a very responsive engine, relatively smooth down below in comparison to old V2 air cooled lump. Trust me I know have an m900 that is a bitch below 3k (done 20k miles on it), m695 bit better (30k miles), had a Mosnter 750 for 8k miles, ridden hyper 1100 a lot, monster 696 (week as replacement bike) as well as 1100s (about 1k miles). Multistrada for 4k miles, 900ss for about 8k miles, 749s for 14k miles, 996 for 8k miles, 1098 for a week. Not to mention ST2, ST3 and ST4. Hyper 821 is smooth as butter in comparison.
If someone comes here and says they are rough at low RPM, bleh bleh bleh, it is a V2 it has right to be. Do not moan as it is miles better than even Ducati bikes of 1098 vintage and earlier. No idea what they done but it just is and as result is not as bad as people make it out to be.
Engine revs freely to 6k where I mostly stop but when went over that it just keeps on going. Power delivery is smooth, predictable but strong. It is not a top speed engine and you know it very quickly.
This is my 1st engine with DTC and do not see so far why it would need DTC, in fact on half of DTC settings it makes it a worse engine dangerous even will get to that.
Handling of the bike is superb you can see the evolution in progress, it tips in to corners with ease. Stays in them smoothly going round bend and then lifts up with nowhere to be seen rush but still fast. It just flows, feels you with confidence and gives great feedback. Saying that when you open a throttle some it does get a very light front which is odd seeing how much you sit at the front of it. Probably due to big suspension travel so possibly can be addressed. Many say that is what DTC is for but frankly it should just not do that at all.
In comparison Monster is harder to get it to tip in. Kind off feels like initial push on bars requires more effort but when it is moving it is just as smooth to flick about. All those flicks need more initial effort that is all. It is more stable mid corner and you can just whack the throttle open and it will pull out no fuss what so ever. It also does not want to pop a wheelie that much but if that is better is debatable. Saying that m695 is not a wheelie machine. I would still say Hyper is better in that area over all.